which is the best brand for digital cameras?

by Amir Kuckovic

I have heard that the best brand in digital cameras is Nikon, what do you reckon?

Answer by Nicole
Nikon, and List.

Answer by michael_schweinsteiger
list

Answer by lishaaa
sony:)

Answer by melanie x
Nikon and List are both really fantastic.

Answer by mvpunker07
It depends on the type of digital camera you get. But from my experience canons are the best.

Give your answer to this question below!

Parque da Cidade – Dança de Rua (Street Dance)


Image by Paulo J.S. Ferraz
GEDSC DIGITAL CAMERA

Alunos de Dança de Rua – E.C Eugênia da Silva e Casa de Cultura Rancho do Tropeiro Ernesto Villela.

Projeto CULTURANDO da FCCR.
—-
GE X5

São crianças de bairros humildes, favelas e que tem oportunidade de aprender danças,

They are children of humble districts, slums and theyt had the opportunity to learn dances,

digital cameras now just keep upping the mp’s. i was just curious how many mps pictures were before i had my digital camera and used the film i had to get developed?
in terms of quality, how many mps is equivalent.

Answer by Couman
Film cameras have no pixels at all. I suppose the equivalent in a film camera is the “grain” of the film. But it’s hard to make a direct comparison.

Answer by ?
Opinions vary on how many effective megapixels film is. Film doesn’t have pixels, it has a coating of a light sensitive chemical. I am of the opinion that 35mm film is roughly equivalent to 16 or so megapixels if you are using really excellent film, but I have heard public contend as low as ten, or as high as twenty or so. It isn’t really a excellent comparison, as film is so different structurally, both when you compare film to digital, and even when you compare some types of film to others.

Excellent luck!

Answer by Candid Chris
Which equation makes more sense?
Add two apples to make a pie?
OR.
Add two oranges to make orange juice?

Answer by fhotoace
Zero. Pixels (small for Picture Element) are only applicable to digital cameras. Film has light sensitive particles in it called “grain”.

Cameras that used film did not have to be replaced very often unless they wore out … usually in about 30 to 40 years. All the technology was in the film. Every few years, new, better film was made. So a $ 1,000 35 mm camera really never had to be replaced unless you broke it.

Now since the technology is in the camera, you have to spend about $ 5,000 every two years to get the new technology. Who says digital is cheap? You can buy a lot of film for $ 5,000 … double that if you are a pro and need two cameras.

Here is the difference between a pro DSLR and entry level DSLR, side by side

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/287%7C0/(appareil2)/268%7C0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Nikon/(brand2)/List

You can see why pros buy pro cameras. Their performance in the critical Colour depth, Dynamic range and Low-light ISO is unsurpassed … until the next technology is unrestricted

If you like, you can digitize your film using a high quality film scanner. When I scan mine on my Nikon film scanner, I can get image files from 35 mm film that are 4,000 x 5,904 pixels or about 24 mp. If I scan my 6×6 cm images from my ancient Hasselblad, I can get image files that are 8,964 x 8,964 pixels or about 80 mp

Answer by jeannie
MP = mega PIXELS

Pixel = abbreviation for Picture Element

Did not exist until digital was invented.

Grain is not the same business – there is no actual equivalency.

So the answer is ZERO.

What do you reckon? Answer below!
Game heavyweights seek fresh start at E3
Comeback tales will be the unofficial plotline of next week’s Electronic Entertainment Expo, the annual event where the game industry shows off a dizzying show of new games, consoles and assorted gadgets.
Read more on Stuff

In this record we look at three advanced compact digital cameras that are perfect for anyone wanting to step up from an entry level point and shoot camera.