Sunday, May 29, 2011

Nikon Coolpix L24 Review?

Nikon Coolpix L24 Review?

I’m interested in the Nikon Coolpix L24 camera, if anyone owns it please give me a review of it. Thanks.

Answer by RAY
mediocre camera when compared to
sony dsc w530
and
canon ixus 105

which cost the same and give much better performance .

Answer by Shaina S
Yes its a good quality camera

A replacement for last year’s Coolpix L22, the Nikon Coolpix L24 is based around a 1/2.3″-type CCD image sensor with a slightly higher effective resolution of 14.0 megapixels.

Features:-

•Incredible 3.0-inch LCD and ISO 1600 Capability
•Easy Auto Mode automatically selects the best settings for a photograph and a Scene Mode system that allows the user to choose from 16 scenes to find the best one for the situation
•AA-battery power
•Available in February 2011 for $ 119.95 in Red, Black and Silver

Give your answer to this question below!

Nikon CoolPix P90 Review-MommyPR
nikon coolpix reviews

Image by MommyPR

I bought the Nikon Coolpix expecting a very nice versatile camera for all my needs. I’m starting to go professional with my photography, and I wanted something nice. But what do I get? Grainy photos worth nothing, ISO out of whack and moving pictures are blurry! I am very unpleased with this camera and am wanting to get something new or take it back… which I can’t do as I bought it probably a month ago.

I need a camera that can take great pictures under the following conditions:

Dark
FAR away (needs great optical zoom. 15x+)
Moving

And I am not getting what I want. I am a horse photographer, mainly, and a lot of horse shows are taken place in the dark, far away, with moving pictures. And no flash. Horses will spook. Is the Nikon Coolpix P90 better? Or is the whole “Coolpix” line not very good? I don’t want to spend more than $ 400.00 on a camera. 300 is much preferred. Any suggestions to a great camera like that? I also don’t want something where I’ll have to buy new batteries every week.

Answer by Little Pooky
None of the point and shoot cameras, i.e. Coolpix, will be suitable for what you need.

You need a dSLR. If you want to stay with Nikon, that’s fine, too, because they make fine dSLRs that will meet your needs. The problem is to shoot your subjects, you’ll need a fast (zoom) lens and that’s going to likely cost more than the camera.

Answer by Elliot Dimauro
well, I have that camera and it’s been doing me good, you just have to be aware that when you zoom in, the more the camera detects movement in your hands, and it won’t be as clear as it was unzoomed. The P90 is obviously a better camera because it has better zoom. You should also be aware of the right setting to use when the time calls for them.

Answer by Carl_the_Truth
You can’t “go professional ” with these point and shoot cameras ! You need a DSLR ! The problem isn’t the camera, it’s what you are expecting out of it. To shoot in low light, you need a fast lens.This isn’t going to happen with a cheap camera.It’s impossible to get the results you want with a point and shoot camera.They just aren’t designed for what you want to use them for.The Coolpix line is fine. They just aren’t designed to shoot horse shows !
Sorry, it just can’t be done in your price range.The Nikon D40 is a ‘beginner’ DSLR, and it’s over $ 450 with a basic starter lens.You’d also need a zoom lens, and that runs into the hundreds itself.
I suggest you talk to a photographer you see at the next horse show you go to. And ask him / her what they use.

Answer by Crim Liar
The Nikon Coolpix L100 is far from a professional camera. It’s one of those cameras that by all counts should be better than it is.

Oddly this camera (until they release a firmware update) doesn’t allow you to manually mess with the ISO! While bridge cameras tend to manage video better than compacts (and better than a couple of DSLRs which do this) they are still no match for even quite cheap video cameras.

The Nikon Coolpix P90 will not be significantly better than your current L100. If you have to have still and motion pictures from the one camera you would be better looking at camcorders that manage high resolution stills from the likes of Canon, Panasonic, and Samsung. If your stills have to be absolute high quality though then you are really going to need separate still and motion cameras.

If you are going “pro” then it doesn’t come cheap – hell most of my kit falls in the pro-sumer band and that’s dear enough!

Give your answer to this question below!

For the full Nikon Coolpix S1100pj review, go to www.infosyncworld.com The mere thought of stuffing a projector inside a point-and-shoot camera is radical to the max. Nikon is on its second projector cam model, after its successful debut of the Coolpix S1000pj. The new Nikon Coolpix S1100pj brings more projector lumens, meaning a brighter display, and the ability to connect to a computer, projecting anything on its screen. The Nikon Coolpix S1100pj also features a megapixel boost for 2010, along with Nikon’s latest Expeed C2 image processing. With touch-screen functionality and lots of scene modes, we found the S1100pj suited for point-and-shoot users who can’t wait to get home to throw pictures on Facebook and hate the mere thought of crowding around a minute LCD screen.


No comments:

Post a Comment