Kodak Digital camera, c653, got dampened in water is it repairable?

I got the kodak c653 digital camera which got dampened, can it be repaired if yes whom do i need to show? i stay at hyderabad, please suggest..

Answer by j_acuff
Electronics and water don’t go well collectively. If it works after drying out, fantastic. If not, the water probably caused a small circuit which would make it doubtful that it can be repaired. But, I’ve seen electronics survive water hurt, but the battery was ruined. You might get lucky and get by with only having to get a new battery.

What do you reckon? Answer below!

Mt. Hood, cinder cone


Image by SoulRider.222
9/10/06. Oregon. While walking. Kodak camera. Handheld. SOOC.

I had a new Kodak Z8612 digital camera. I introduce in it the CRV3 battery that I had get with the camera. I made about 10 -20 pictures and a few films in about 5 days. And then the battery stop working. Is it rechargeable? Should I buy a battery charger?

Answer by Golfer
No that isn’t a rechargeable battery. I would suggest getting Duracell or Energizer rechargeable AAs (your camera takes 2). They will save you $ in the longrun.

You can find them with the charger at any electronics store, most hardware supplies or online.

Answer by pOOkEy
No. This battery is not rechargeable. The recommended battery for your camera is the KLIC-8000 Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery. Try the KODAK Li-Ion Rapid Battery Charger K8500 Bundle with Item # 8018566 that costs $ 44.95. This item includes a charger and a klic 8000 rechargeable battery. See the link below

http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=15291&pq-locale=en_US&cm_sp=alt_prod-_-bundle-_-EKN036681

Contact Kodak online store at 1.888.368.6600

Add your own answer in the comments!
Kodak wins round in patent dispute with Apple
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) – Shares of Eastman Kodak Co. shot higher Friday after a judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission second-hand Apple Inc.’s digital-camera patent claims against the photography lead the way. Kodak’s technology does not infringe on Apple’s patent rights, and one of the two patents in dispute is invalid, Robert …
Read more on The Washington Times